Re: [RFC/GSoC] Introduction

> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Sidhant Sharma <tigerkid001@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Coincidentally, my approach too is a wrapper around git as you suggest.
>> The approach is simple and straight forward, but I wasn't sure if it would be
>> accepted on the list, mainly because it may not look consistent with the current
>> interface `git command [options]`. Perhaps a configuration like
>> `core.beginnerMode` [4] might be apt? By default, it can be false, making git
>> behave normally. When set, a safety-check can be run before the command is
>> executed to ensure it's not potentially destructive. Very much like a wrapper
>> but on the inside. There can be an option like `--no-beginner` to override
>> this configuration from the command-line. I was wondering if there should be
>> command-specific options as well, such as `beginner.allowForcePush`,
>> `beginner.allowRebase` etc. for a finer control over what commands git would warn
>> the user about. By default, all are set to false, and warning is shown when any
>> of them is encountered. Another configuration that may be considered is
>> `beginner.strict`, which when set would just print the warning and die, instead
>> of giving the user an option to continue (though I'm a little unsure whether
>> this one would be a good idea).
>> One thing that bothers me about this approach is that unlike the explicit 'ggit'
>> wrapper, an internal wrapper would add (unnecessary?) overhead for most commands,
>> thus impacting the performance. Will that be an issue?
>>
> If I recall correctly, a configuration setting was previously
> discussed but mostly discarded as a solution since any changes had
> better not impact any current scripts. Having to add "--no-beginner"
> for all of them seems unacceptable. Especially since many scripts may
> do potentially dangerous operations in a safe or useful way.
>