Re: [PATCH v10] ls-files: add eol diagnostics
- From
Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
- Date
- Jan 12, 2016, 06:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <56949C53.5030605@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq8u3wxb0i.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On 01/11/2016 06:48 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Thanks for comments
>> + if (line_terminator == '\n')
>> + printf("i/%-6s w/%-6s attr/%-9s ", i_txt, w_txt, a_txt);
> Can we do something better than these hard-coded constants? Why
> can't the "one HT between each" approach be used for both?v11 will make more clear, that currently "eol=crlf" is the same as "text eol=crlf". The shortest attr is then "", the longest "text eol=crlf". Using '\t' as a separator makes the output cluttered for a human reader.
When parsing the output, the '\t' is much more convenient (and that's what t0027 wil use). Is there any chance to have a selection between human-friendly and script-friendly ? Would an option -e (eol info using spaces) vs --eol (eol info with TABs) make sence ?