Re: [PATCH 2/2] git-svn: test for git-svn prefixed globs
- From
Victor Leschuk <vleschuk@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 16, 2015, 21:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5671D82B.8020107@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20151216212811.GA19884@dcvr.yhbt.net>
Hello Eric, sorry, I just copy pasted your old t9108-git-svn-glob.sh, changed branch names to be prefixed and added test for "exact" prefix match. If it is necessary I can rewrite it according to current guidelines.
On 12/17/2015 12:28 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
Show 41 quoted lines
> Thanks for this work. Most things look fine with 1/2, comments > on 2/2 below... > > Victor Leschuk <vleschuk@gmail.com> wrote: >> Add test for git-svn prefixed globs. > Why a separate patch? Unless there's some documentation purpose > for a regression, usually tests and a feature should be added > atomically in the same commit. > >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/t/t9168-git-svn-prefixed-glob.sh >> @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ >> +#!/bin/sh >> +test_description='git svn globbing refspecs with prefixed globs' >> +. ./lib-git-svn.sh >> + >> +cat > expect.end <<EOF > We prefer redirects in new code to be in the form of ">foo" (no space) > (or ">>foo" for append). > > It wasn't in the old tests, either, but Documentation/CodingGuidelines > favors this for new code. > >> +the end >> +hi >> +start a new branch >> +initial >> +EOF > All the setup code be checked for errors with '&&' as well. > >> + test "`git rev-parse refs/remotes/tags/t_end~1`" = \ >> + "`git rev-parse refs/remotes/branches/b_start`" && >> + test "`git rev-parse refs/remotes/branches/b_start~2`" = \ >> + "`git rev-parse refs/remotes/trunk`" && > And we prefer $(command) instead of `command` for nestability > as Documentation/CodingGuidelines suggests. > > (yeah, most of the old tests don't follow the guidelines, but the > guidelines also warn against fixup patches for them). > > Thanks again.