Re: branch --set-upstream-to unexpectedly fails with "starting point ... is no branch"
- From
Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz@syntevo.com>
- Date
- Nov 23, 2015, 18:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <56536224.3050306@syntevo.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <15ED3D48-282B-44EF-98C6-EA59F18D633E@dwim.me>
On 23.11.2015 18:04, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Hello Mark, > > On 23 Nov 2015, at 12:04, Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz@syntevo.com> wrote: > >> There is a strange "branch --set-upstream-to" failure for "clones" which haven't been created using "git clone" but constructed using "git init", "git remote add" and "git fetch". >> >> Following script first creates a "main" repository and then constructs the clone. Finally, in the clone branches origin/1 and origin/2 will be present, however it's not possible to invoke "git branch --set-upstream-to" for origin/2 (it works fine for origin/1). >> >> I guess the behavior is related to following line in .git/config: >> >> fetch = refs/heads/1:refs/remotes/origin/1 >> >> However, I don't understand what's the problem for Git here? Definitely the error "starting point 'origin/2' is not a branch" is wrong. >> > > That is indeed the issue. The configuration which is stored in the configuration is a remote+branch pair. If there is no fetch refspec configured which would create the ‘origin/2’ remote-tracking branch, the command does not know which remote and branch that would correspond to.
Thanks, Carlos, I understand now.
My goal is to have a clone which will only fetch specific branches, so I guess I have to stick with "refs/heads/1:refs/remotes/origin/1" for the beginning and for every new branch X add another "refs/heads/X:refs/remotes/origin/X"? Or is there a better way?
-Marc