Re: [PATCH 3/2] test: factor out helper function test_must_contain
- From
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
- Date
- Nov 21, 2015, 08:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <56502745.2000307@kdbg.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <564F8781.1080902@web.de>
Am 20.11.2015 um 21:50 schrieb René Scharfe:
> Extract a helper function for searching for a pattern in a file and > printing the whole file if the pattern is not found. It is useful > when starting tests with --verbose for debugging purposes.
Show 11 quoted lines
> +# Check if a file contains an expected pattern.
> +test_must_contain () {
> + if grep "$1" "$2"
> + then
> + return 0
> + else
> + echo "didn't find /$1/ in '$2', it contains:"
> + cat "$2"
> + return 1
> + fi
> +}There is already test_i18n_grep. Should it be folded into this function? Wouldn't we also want to have a function test_must_not_contain?
IMHO, we should not increase the number of functions that give a bonus only when there is a test case failure. They do not scale well: There is a permanent mental burden on every reviewer to watch out that they are used in new tests. But without those functions, the burden is on the one person investigating a test case failure, who has to live without the debugging support.
-- Hannes