Aw: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove outdated/missleading/irrelevant entries from glossary-content.txt
- From
Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de>
- Date
- Apr 2, 2013, 17:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <559824715.741522.1364923497242.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail15.arcor-online.net>
Show 5 quoted lines
> > The text indeed has a room for improvement, but it probably makes > sense to have an entry for `directory` here, as folks who are used > to say "Folders" may not know what it is. >
I assumed the number of such people so low that it's not worth to keep this - to most people obvious - explanation.
Show 6 quoted lines
> > Which one of outdated, misleading or irrelevant category does this > fall into? It certainly is not outdated (diff --cc/-c is often a > way to view evil merges), the text defines what an evil merge is > precisely and I do not think it is misleading. Is it irrelevant? >
I considered it "irrelevant" because it tries to define "evil merge" which is - at least to my experience - not used as some kind of well known notion. But I might of course be wrong.
Show 5 quoted lines
> > Even though I personally am slightly in favor of removal, I suspect > that is primarily because I already know what Git tag is, and it is > different from the type tag in the Lisp-speak. >
I assumed the cardinality of the set of Lisp users is so small that this addition will confuse more people than help somebody.
--- Thomas