Re: git name-rev not accepting abbreviated SHA with --stdin
- From
Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 25, 2015, 02:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <558B60E4.9020604@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqsi9g8x51.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On 06/25/2015 05:41 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com> writes: > >> This *is* documented, but I'm curious why this distinction is made. > > I think it is from mere laziness, and also in a smaller degree > coming from an expectation that --stdin would be fed by another > script like rev-list where feeding full 40-hex is less work than > feeding unique abbreviated prefix.
Makes sense; thanks. Maybe if I feel really adventurous I will, one day, look at the code :-)