Re: Why can't I stash submodule changes?
- From
- Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>
- Date
- Apr 6, 2015, 15:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5522A2EC.9050100@ubuntu.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAAKwDd8SVA=ynzH_U1M3bb+mLZMnF79-imBLrU+x9qcbXfWO3g@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 4/5/2015 10:15 PM, Shane da Silva wrote:
> I’m trying to wrap my head around why this is the current behavior, > as I suspect this is intentional but it seems unexpected. If anyone > can shed any light on this, I would really appreciate it!
Why would you expect anything else? You have no local changes ( since you committed them already ). In other words, git status shows no uncommitted changes, so there is nothing to stash.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVIqLsAAoJENRVrw2cjl5RFGsIAIC38/iZTQsYWfeS8mOt3DVY jrRCrbfHcjQyKWsEk2seupEV1K1OO0lPhocRE4+3T+vAz3n9Wdc+ATuXNv41vmkY r2R3VaTXimLw6NfaSxMfqEb4xL/9M0UhUS7SdEALVEApS4AySxYKWKL+RoqF0LWD JgP6DHCzOLBy8cttaQppZdfRHa34FUmeH1k7m6r/14tarwcc+a3glVqW7i3gue7z s3zhEkd+dqgab79TNj1gh86UE016UmG7yjbBTWKnNrYdTCW5IBCDqsp0We2PH1Jy 2QPckedCisroZjq0I4uAbuUCm94obiEJKclbY+Wl4sVdYb9rralBOJnPkKwRsiw= =4ekO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----