Re: [PATCH 5/8] reflog: rearrange the manpage

From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Feb 12, 2015, 15:17 UTC
Message-ID: <54DCC40E.4040506@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kY+AN6fmbBfCBdkUXiBSgJusFa7Jv2OS=n=EPXBpzp8EQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/11/2015 12:42 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:

Show 17 quoted lines

> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> ---all::
>> -       Instead of listing <refs> explicitly, prune all refs.
>> +--stale-fix::
>> +       This revamps the logic -- the definition of "broken commit"
>> +       becomes: a commit that is not reachable from any of the refs and
>> +       there is a missing object among the commit, tree, or blob
>> +       objects reachable from it that is not reachable from any of the
>> +       refs.
> 
> --stale-fix becomes more and more irrelevant over time,
> so why not put in at the very end even after --all ?
> 
> Thinking out loud:
> (--expire=,--expire-unreachable= and --stale-fix) look like a group
> and (--updateref --rewrite --verbose and --all) also feel like a group,
> so you wanted to keep --stale-fix after --expire-unreachable= ?

Yes, that's what I was thinking.

But you are right that the docs could be improved even more, so in the re-roll I will make some further changes.

> While talking about this man page, we should also add --dry-run?

Good point. I'll fix that, too.

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu