git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Teaching -Xours/-Xtheirs to binary ll-merge driver

From
SBStephen Bash <bash@genarts.com>
Date
Sep 9, 2012, 14:30 UTC
Message-ID
<545618054.286621.1347201018375.JavaMail.root@genarts.com>
In-Reply-To
<1347165639-12149-1-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>
----- Original Message -----
Show 26 quoted lines
> From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 9, 2012 12:40:37 AM
> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Teaching -Xours/-Xtheirs to binary ll-merge driver
> 
> The part that grants Stephen's wish is unchanged from the earlier
> "perhaps like this" patch, but this time with a bit of documentation
> and test.
> 
> A more important change between the two actually is [PATCH 2/2].
> When a "binary" synthetic attribute is given to a path, we used to
> (1) disable textual diff and (2) disable CR/LF conversion, but it is
> also sane to disable the textual merge for a path marked as
> "binary", and setting the "-merge" attribute to summon the "binary"
> ll-merge driver is the way to do so.
> 
> Junio C Hamano (2):
>   merge: teach -Xours/-Xtheirs to binary ll-merge driver
>   attr: "binary" attribute should choose built-in "binary" merge
>   driver
> 
>  Documentation/gitattributes.txt    |  2 +-
>  Documentation/merge-strategies.txt |  3 ++-
>  attr.c                             |  2 +-
>  ll-merge.c                         | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  t/t6037-merge-ours-theirs.sh       | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Thanks for this Junio.  After figuring out how to make the corporate email server NOT munge the patches, I was able to apply these with no problem.  Then 
  $ git merge -Xtheirs maint
mostly does what I want, but conflicting files deleted on the incoming branch are still marked unmerged/"deleted by them" (binary or not).  I'm not sure what the best (most common?) resolution is for that.  In my case I would be happy for the -Xtheirs to also delete the files, but that might not always be the right answer (but then again -Xtheirs is a pretty heavy hammer to begin with).

Thanks, Stephen

Previous: Jeff King
Message 12 of 12 in “Binary file-friendly merge -Xours or -Xtheirs?”
  1. Stephen BashSep 7, 2012
  2. Junio C HamanoSep 7, 2012
  3. 0/2 Teaching -Xours/-Xtheirs to binary ll-merge driverJunio C Hamano, Sep 9, 2012
  4. 1/2 merge: teach -Xours/-Xtheirs to binary ll-merge driverJunio C Hamano, Sep 9, 2012
  5. 2/2 attr: "binary" attribute should choose built-in "binary" merge driverJunio C Hamano, Sep 9, 2012
  6. Jeff KingSep 10, 2012
  7. Junio C HamanoSep 12, 2012
  8. Stephen BashSep 12, 2012
  9. Junio C HamanoSep 12, 2012
  10. Stephen BashSep 12, 2012
  11. Jeff KingSep 12, 2012
  12. Stephen BashSep 9, 2012

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.