Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/technical: signature formats
- From
Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 25, 2014, 08:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <544B5FA1.2050804@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq7fzshqrb.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
W dniu 2014-10-22 21:02, Junio C Hamano pisze:
Show 7 quoted lines
> A mergetag is not fundamentally a "signature" in the above sense, > though. It is just a dump of the object content in a regular object > header field (hence indented by one SP), and its contents having PGP > SIGNATURE is merely a natural consequence of the object recorded > being a signed tag. So the description of it in the same place as > description for signed tags and signed commits feels a little bit > out of place, but I do not think of a better place to describe it.
Does this mean that you can merge annotated (but not signed) tag, and have it (as description of merged branch) in 'mergetag' header?
-- Jakub Narębski