git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] Copy mergetool "bc3" as "bc4"

From
Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com>
Date
Oct 20, 2014, 18:23 UTC
Message-ID
<54455334.8000503@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<xmqqtx2y3avx.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On 20.10.2014 19:32, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
>>> Beyond compare 4 is out since september 2014. The CLI interface
>>> doesn't seem to have changed compared to the version 3.
>>
>> Hmph, if this is identical to mergetools/bc3, why is the patch even
>> needed?  Do we auto-detect something and try to use bc4 which does
>> not exist and fail, and we must supply a copy as bc4 to prevent it?
The patch is indeed not needed, which is why I haven't cared to provide it so far although I'm now using Beyond Compare 4 instead of version 3 myself.
>> It may feel somewhat strange to have to say "mergetool --tool=bc3"
>> when you know what you have is version 4 and not version 3, but in
That's exactly the only reason I could think of why it could be nice to have a "bc4".
>> that case, I wonder if there are reasons why calling both versions
>> just "bc" is a bad idea.  And assuming that version 5 and later
IMHO, the only reason not to just have a single "bc" is to maintain backward compatibility for users already using "bc3". But for the sake of cleaner code, personally I'd be fine with that minor backward compatibility breakage.
Show 6 quoted lines
>> Perhaps version 2 and before are unusable as a mergetool backend or
>> something?
> 
> It seems that ffe6dc08 (mergetool--lib: Add Beyond Compare 3 as a
> tool, 2011-02-27) is the first mention of "Beyond Compare" and it
> only was interested in version 3 and nothing else.
Beyond Compare versions prior to 3 do not run on Linux, but only on Windows, which is why I did not care to submit a patch.
> Perhaps something like this, so that existing users can still use
> "bc3" and other people can use "bc" if it bothers them that they
> have to say "3" when the backend driver works with both 3 and 4?
That indeed sounds like the best approach.
Show 8 quoted lines
> --- a/git-mergetool--lib.sh
> +++ b/git-mergetool--lib.sh
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ list_merge_tool_candidates () {
>   			tools="opendiff kdiff3 tkdiff xxdiff meld $tools"
>   		fi
>   		tools="$tools gvimdiff diffuse diffmerge ecmerge"
> -		tools="$tools p4merge araxis bc3 codecompare"
> +		tools="$tools p4merge araxis bc bc3 codecompare"
Why keep bc3 here?
And shouldn't we update git-gui/lib/mergetool.tcl, too?
-- 
Sebastian Schuberth
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 4 of 8 in “Copy mergetool "bc3" as "bc4"”
  1. Copy mergetool "bc3" as "bc4"Olivier Croquette, Oct 20, 2014
  2. Junio C HamanoOct 20, 2014
  3. Junio C HamanoOct 20, 2014
  4. Sebastian SchuberthOct 20, 2014
  5. Junio C HamanoOct 20, 2014
  6. David AguilarOct 21, 2014
  7. Junio C HamanoOct 21, 2014
  8. Olivier CroquetteOct 20, 2014

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.