Re: [PATCH 0/4] Multiple worktrees vs. submodules fixes

> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Hmph.  I was hoping that the multiple-work-trees topic was ready for
>> 'next' by now, but we may want to wait to see how the interaction
>> with submodule plays out to have another chance of a clean reroll
>> before it happens.  This is a topic with large impact and is quite
>> intrusive code-wise, even though the intrusive parts are cleanly
>> done.  So we'd want to take more time to unleash it to the general
>> public than more usual small scale topics, anyway.
>
> Originally I wanted to get it merged without submodule support, but I
> failed to spot the local_repo_env problem and could have caused a
> regression for submodules. So yeah delaying the series does not sound
> bad. Not sure about the reroll (i.e. rewriting current patches). I
> think putting patches on top with explanation is better. But we can
> keep it in 'pu' and see if we really need to reroll.