Re: [PATCH for-maint] apply: gitdiff_verify_name(): accept "/dev/null\r"
- From
- Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
- Date
- Sep 23, 2014, 20:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5421D8C4.2080009@redhat.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqsijihzrb.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On 09/23/14 22:02, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 33 quoted lines
> Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> writes: > >> On 09/23/14 20:54, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> ... >>> SMTP transport may be CRLF-unsafe, so I have a suspicion that it may >>> turn out that what you are trying to do might be an equilvalent of >>> >>> git format-patch ... | >>> # first lose all \r\n >>> dos2unix | >>> # then make everything \r\n >>> unix2dos | >>> # and apply >>> git am >>> >>> which is not workable in the first place. I dunno. >> >> I agree with your analysis. It is indeed the MTA... >>> - CR and LF MUST only occur together as CRLF; they MUST NOT appear >>> independently in the body. >> >> But why is this situation "not workable"? The same happens with *all* >> patches that people mail around, it's just not visible to them, because >> git-am strips all CRs indiscriminately. > > It is not "git am" or "git apply" that "strips all CRs > indiscriminately". I just tried to apply 0001-add-f2 without > letting your MTA/MUA corrupt it on "master" branch in the repository > you prepared that patch from, i.e. > > git checkout master^0 ;# go back > git am 0001-add-f2* ;# apply that "+hello world\r\n" patch > git diff branch ;# nothing
When you did this, was am.keepcr=true in effect?
Thanks Laszlo