Re: [RFC/PATCH V2] branch.c: replace git_config with git_config_get_string
- From
Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 26, 2014, 08:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <53ABD52B.3030502@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cTMWKtAjN931voVs7aY7JdEyaRVZj+-qDUiDk0C_Tq6-A@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/25/2014 10:15 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
>> diff --git a/branch.c b/branch.c
>> index 660097b..c9a2a0d 100644
>> --- a/branch.c
>> +++ b/branch.c
>> @@ -140,33 +140,25 @@ static int setup_tracking(const char *new_ref, const char *orig_ref,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -struct branch_desc_cb {
>> +struct branch_desc {
>> const char *config_name;
>> const char *value;
>> };
>
> What is the purpose of retaining this structure? Following your
> changes, it is never used outside of read_branch_desc(), and
> 'config_name' and 'value' would be more naturally declared as
> variables local to that function.Done. :)
Show 34 quoted lines
>
>> -static int read_branch_desc_cb(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
>> -{
>> - struct branch_desc_cb *desc = cb;
>> - if (strcmp(desc->config_name, var))
>> - return 0;
>> - free((char *)desc->value);
>> - return git_config_string(&desc->value, var, value);
>> -}
>> -
>> int read_branch_desc(struct strbuf *buf, const char *branch_name)
>> {
>> - struct branch_desc_cb cb;
>> + const char *value = NULL;
>> + struct branch_desc desc;
>> struct strbuf name = STRBUF_INIT;
>> strbuf_addf(&name, "branch.%s.description", branch_name);
>> - cb.config_name = name.buf;
>> - cb.value = NULL;
>> - if (git_config(read_branch_desc_cb, &cb) < 0) {
>> + desc.config_name = name.buf;
>> + desc.value = NULL;
>> + git_config_get_string(desc.config_name, &value);
>> + if (git_config_string(&desc.value, desc.config_name, value) < 0) {
>
> Although it works in this case, it's somewhat ugly that you ignore the
> return value of git_config_get_string(), and a person reading the code
> has to spend extra time digging into git_config_string() to figure out
> why this is safe. If might be clearer for future readers by rephrasing
> like this:
>
> if (git_config_get_string(desc.config_name, &value) < 0 ||
> git_config_string(&desc.value, desc.config_name, value) < 0) {
>Noted, also didn't the old code leak desc.value as it was xstrduped by git_config_string()? Thanks for the review.
Show 12 quoted lines
>> strbuf_release(&name); >> return -1; >> } >> - if (cb.value) >> - strbuf_addstr(buf, cb.value); >> + strbuf_addstr(buf, desc.value); >> strbuf_release(&name); >> return 0; >> } >> -- >> 1.9.0.GIT >