Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] config: add hashtable for config parsing & retrieval

> On 23/06/14 11:11, Tanay Abhra wrote:
>> diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
>> index a1aef1c..6200f36 100644
>> --- a/config.c
>> +++ b/config.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>>  #include "exec_cmd.h"
>>  #include "strbuf.h"
>>  #include "quote.h"
>> +#include "hashmap.h"
>> +#include "string-list.h"
>>  
>>  struct config_source {
>>  	struct config_source *prev;
>> @@ -37,6 +39,141 @@ static struct config_source *cf;
>>  
>>  static int zlib_compression_seen;
>>  
>> +struct config_cache_entry {
>> +	struct hashmap_entry ent;
>> +	char *key;
>> +	struct string_list value_list;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int hashmap_initialized;
>> +
>> +static int config_cache_add_value(const char *key, const char *value);
>> +
>> +static int config_cache_entry_cmp(const struct config_cache_entry *e1,
>> +				 const struct config_cache_entry *e2, const void *unused)
>> +{
>> +	return strcmp(e1->key, e2->key);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void config_cache_init(struct hashmap *config_cache)
>> +{
>> +	hashmap_init(config_cache, (hashmap_cmp_fn)config_cache_entry_cmp, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int config_cache_callback(const char *key, const char *value, void *unused)
>> +{
>> +	config_cache_add_value(key, value);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct hashmap *get_config_cache(void)
>> +{
>> +	static struct hashmap config_cache;
>> +	if (!hashmap_initialized) {
>> +		config_cache_init(&config_cache);
>> +		hashmap_initialized = 1;
>> +		git_config(config_cache_callback, NULL);
>> +	}
>> +	return &config_cache;
>> +}
> 
> [I have not been following this series at all (sorry I haven't had
> the time to spare), so take these comments with a very big pinch of
> salt! ie just ignore me if it's already been discussed etc. ;-) ]
> 
> The 'git config' command can be used to read arbitrary files (so long
> as they conform to the config syntax). For example, see the --file and
> --blob options to git-config. At present, I think only scripted commands
> use this facility (eg git-submodule). Noting the singleton config_cache,
> what happens when git-submodule becomes a C builtin, or indeed any other
> C builtin wants to take advantage of the new code when processing a non-
> standard config file?
> 

>> +
>> +static void config_cache_free(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct hashmap *config_cache;
>> +	struct config_cache_entry *entry;
>> +	struct hashmap_iter iter;
>> +	config_cache = get_config_cache();
>> +	hashmap_iter_init(config_cache, &iter);
>> +	while ((entry = hashmap_iter_next(&iter))) {
>> +		free(entry->key);
>> +		string_list_clear(&entry->value_list, 1);
>> +	}
>> +	hashmap_free(config_cache, 1);
>> +	hashmap_initialized = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct config_cache_entry *config_cache_find_entry(const char *key)
>> +{
>> +	struct hashmap *config_cache;
>> +	struct config_cache_entry k;
>> +	struct config_cache_entry *found_entry;
>> +	char *normalized_key;
>> +	int ret;
>> +	config_cache = get_config_cache();
>> +	ret = git_config_parse_key(key, &normalized_key, NULL);
>> +
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>> +	hashmap_entry_init(&k, strhash(normalized_key));
>> +	k.key = normalized_key;
>> +	found_entry = hashmap_get(config_cache, &k, NULL);
>> +	free(normalized_key);
>> +	return found_entry;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct string_list *config_cache_get_value(const char *key)
>> +{
>> +	struct config_cache_entry *e = config_cache_find_entry(key);
>> +	return e ? &e->value_list : NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int config_cache_add_value(const char *key, const char *value)
>> +{
>> +	struct hashmap *config_cache;
>> +	struct config_cache_entry *e;
>> +	struct string_list_item *item;
>> +	int *boolean_null_flag;
>> +
>> +	config_cache = get_config_cache();
>> +	e = config_cache_find_entry(key);
>> +
>> +	boolean_null_flag = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*boolean_null_flag));
>> +
>> +	if (!e) {
>> +		e = xmalloc(sizeof(*e));
>> +		hashmap_entry_init(e, strhash(key));
>> +		e->key = xstrdup(key);
> 
> config_cache_find_entry() searches for (and hashes the) normalized_key.
> Should you not be entering the normalized key here?
>