Re: File extension conflict when working with git and latex
- From
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
- Date
- Mar 21, 2014, 21:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <532CAF94.8040108@alum.mit.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqr45vtnay.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On 03/21/2014 07:32 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 26 quoted lines
> Matthias Beyer <mail@beyermatthias.de> writes: > >> I know, I can fix this by fixing the clean task in my Makefile. But >> maybe someone somewhere on this world doesn't know the git internals >> as good as me (and, of course, my coworker). Is there _any chance >> at all_ that this gets mentioned somewhere, so others don't fall into >> this pit? > > Surely, we are here to please ;-) All of us want to make sure > newbies do not shoot themselves in the foot. > > But the problem is what exactly should be mentioned. With a fresh > wound with your LaTeX project still in your mind, you may be tempted > to special case ".idx", but other newbies may inflict the same kind > of hurt on themselves with different "find" patterns, e.g. > > $ find . -name '[0-9a-f]*[0-9a-f]' -type f -print | xargs rm -f > > when they know their project creates hexadecimal-numbered temoprary > files, or whatever other pattern that match the files they do not > care about, that also happens to match whatever is in $GIT_DIR. The > only common caution that helps us to make sure "others do not fall > into this pit" is "Files and directories in $GIT_DIR are used to > record your work; do not muck with them unless you know what you are > doing e.g. manually repairing a corrupt repository", but that is a > bit lame, isn't it?
It might help some people to show the "find" incantation for skipping files under .git, which I think would be something like
find . -name .git -prune -o \( [...] \) -print0 | xargs -0 rm -f
where "[...]" is whatever condition the user would otherwise use.
Michael
-- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/