Re: [PATCH] rev-parse --parseopt: option argument name hints
- From
Ilya Bobyr <ilya.bobyr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 20, 2014, 08:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <532AA923.6030409@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq61na3u2m.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On 3/19/2014 11:46 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Ilya Bobyr <ilya.bobyr@gmail.com> writes: > >> I can not find this particular patch in the latest "What's cooking" email. >> Is there something I can do? > IIRC, I think I was waiting for the version with a new "Usage text" > section to the documentation you alluded to in this exchange > ($gmane/243924): > > Ilya Bobyr <ilya.bobyr@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 3/11/2014 12:10 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > >>>> Documentation on the whole argument parsing is quite short, so,... > > ... > > I though that an example just to describe `argh' while useful would > > look a bit disproportional, compared to the amount of text on > > --parseopt. > > > > But now that I've added a "Usage text" section to looks quite in place. > > > > I just realized that the second patch I sent did not contain the > > changes. Sorry about - I will resend it.
Oh %) I did sent it in the next minute. And did receive a copy myself. But it seems it never showed up in the list. I am still a bit new to the tools, maybe I did something wrong. Will try again :)
Show 9 quoted lines
>> It does not seems like there is a lot of interest, so I am not sure >> there will be a lot of discussion. >> It is a minor fix and considering the number of the emails on the >> list, I do not unexpected this kind of stuff to be very popular. >> But it seems like a valid improvement to me. >> Maybe I am missing something? > You did the right thing by sending a reminder message with a pointer > to help others locate the original (like the one I am responding > to), as nobody can keep up with a busy list traffic.
Thanks :)
Show 11 quoted lines
>> Same questions about this one: >> >> [PATCH] gitk: replace SHA1 entry field on keyboard paste >> http://www.mail-archive.com/git@vger.kernel.org/msg45040.html >> >> I think they are more or less similar, except that the second one is >> just trivial. > I do not remember if I forwarded the patch to the area maintainer > Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, but if I didn't please do so > yourself. The changes to gitk and git-gui come to me via their own > project repositories.
You did and I even replied with additional details, that I should have included as a cover letter. I can see those messages in the web archive. It seems that Paul Mackerras gitk repository is here: git://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk.git At least that is what is online. I do not see the change in there. I will remind him about it.