Re: [PATCH 0/5] fix up 'jk/pack-bitmap' branch
- From
Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
- Date
- Nov 9, 2013, 11:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <527E1DED.9030800@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20131108222903.GB19912@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On 2013-11-08 23.29, Jeff King wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 06:10:30PM +0100, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: > >> Side question: >> Do we have enough test coverage for htonll()/ntohll(), >> or do we want do the "module test" which I send a couple of days before ? > > The series adds tests for building and using the ewah bitmaps, which in > turn rely on the htonll code. So they are being tested in the existing > series. > > -Peff
You are thinking about t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh ? If I do like this in compat/bswap.h
# define ntohll(n) (n) # define htonll(n) (n) (on an Intel processor, little endian)
then t5310 passes, even if the uint64_t words are written in little endian to disc instead of big endian.
What do I miss? /torsten