Re: [PATCH V4] git clone: is an URL local or ssh
- From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
- Date
- Nov 5, 2013, 07:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <52789AE5.2010702@viscovery.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <201311042220.50178.tboegi@web.de>
Am 11/4/2013 22:20, schrieb Torsten Bögershausen:
> Bug fix for msygit in t5601 : use $PWD insted of $(pwd)
Not really. $PWD is /c/foo/bar style, but $(pwd) is c:/foo/bar, which is equally good.
Show 5 quoted lines
> test_expect_success 'clone with excess parameters (2)' ' > > rm -fr dst && > - test_must_fail git clone -n "file://$(pwd)/src" dst junk > + test_must_fail git clone -n "file://$PWD/src" dst junk
That the code change necessitates this change in the test suite is a sign that there is something wrong with the new code.
And indeed, the original works:
C:\Temp\gittest>git clone -n file://c:/Temp/gittest/foo good Cloning into 'good'... remote: Counting objects: 2, done. remote: Total 2 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) Receiving objects: 100% (2/2), done. Checking connectivity... done.
but the changed code does not:
C:\Temp\gittest>D:\src\mingw-git\git clone -n file://c:/Temp/gittest/foo bad Cloning into 'bad'... fatal: 'D:/Src/MsysGit/Temp/gittest/foo' does not appear to be a git repository fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists.
Can you please make this into a series of small patches so that we can more easily see the good and the bad parts? One of the patches could be a clean-up of the current protocol determination and URL dissection, which is indigestible spaghetti right now.
-- Hannes