Re: [PATCH v3] Add core.mode configuration
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 14, 2013, 21:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <525c63b6711fa_197a905e845b@nysa.notmuch>
- In-Reply-To
- <20131014205908.GA17089@shrek.podlesie.net>
Krzysztof Mazur wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:04:45AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > So that we can specify general modes of operation, specifically, add the > > 'next' mode, which makes Git pre v2.0 behave as Git v2.0. > > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> > > --- > > I don't think that single option it's a good idea. From the user's > point of view I think that the way push.default was introduced and > will be changed is much better. So maybe it's better to just add > "core.addremove" option instead?
Maybe, but what happens when we start doing changes for v3.0? As a user, I don't and to figure out which are the new configurations that will turn v3.0 behavior on, I just want to be testing that mode, even if I'm not following Git development closely. If I find something annoying with core.mode = next, I report the problem to the mailing list, which is good, we want to know problems with the backward-incompatible changes that will be introduced before it's too late, don't we?
I'd be fine with having *both* a fine-tuned option to trigger each specific behavior, and another one that turns all those fine-tuned options on that are meant for v2.0.
Unfortunately, I don't see much interest from Git developers in either.
-- Felipe Contreras