Re: [RFC] New kind of upstream branch: base branch
- From
Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
- Date
- May 17, 2013, 19:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <51968311.1020107@bracey.fi>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s3LQ0GN4rrXdpb8Fe0iLeAEm2VjkH6BHK64pmX-xpc7+Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 15/05/2013 23:34, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > I think I'm using 'upstream' for something it was not intended to, and > I think the current 'upstream' behavior should be split into > 'upstream' and 'base'. >
I found myself thinking the same thing. It's really convenient being able to set your topic branch's upstream to another local branch, so git rebase works without parameters. But then I can't use upstream to point to a remote version of that topic branch. I want my topic branch to know both that it's based on master (or origin/master), and that it's upstream is origin/topic.
So, yes, here's a vote in favour of the general concept.
Kevin