Re: Fwd: git cvsimport implications
- From
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
- Date
- May 17, 2013, 09:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5195F3EB.8000308@alum.mit.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPZPVFZTZFQrCF3gcwcff5LFm9MHhZm-DauLvfzCYrMTw4nQfA@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/15/2013 08:03 PM, Eugene Sajine wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> My primary goal was to understand better what are the real problems > that we might have with the way we use git cvsimport, so I was not > asking about the guarantee of the cvsimport to import things > correctly, but if there is a guarantee the import will result in > completely broken history.
So what are you going to do, use cvsimport whenever you cannot *prove* that it is wrong? You sure have low standards for your software.
The only *useful* guarantee is that software is *correct* under defined circumstances. I don't think anybody has gone to the trouble to figure out when that claim can be made for cvsimport.
> If the cvsimport is that broken - is there any plan to fix it?
For one-time imports, the fix is to use a tool that is not broken, like cvs2git.
Alternatively, Eric Raymond claims to have developed a new version of cvsps that is not quite as broken as the old version. Presumably cvsimport would be not quite as broken if used with the new cvsps.
Michael
-- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/