Re: [PATCH] gitweb/INSTALL: Simplify description of GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM
- From
Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 16, 2013, 07:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <516CF98E.2050706@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vobdfnlc7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> In order to just pick and use the more appropriate one (or a useful > combination of the two), a clean description of what each of them do > without historical cruft is more readable and useful, isn't it? I > would expect that most of them who are newly configuring a system > would pick COMMON one and override per instance as needed, without > touching the SYSTEM one (fallback default) after reading the above, > and that is what we want to happen. > > Do you think sysadmins need a history lesson to understand why there > are two different possibilities?
[...]
> I think the new text conveys the necessary information to the > intended audience with more clarity without the history lesson or > the record of your past frustration. Am I mistaken?
Note also that this is about *gitweb/INSTALL*, which is meant to be *short* and succint description on how to install gitweb, and not about the reference documentation: gitweb(1) or gitweb.conf(5).
Description of historical behavior (and backward compatibility) has place (if any) in manpages, not gitweb/INSTALL.
-- Jakub Narębski