Re: Git/Mac refuses to install on OS X 10.8 (Mountain Lion)
- From
David Foster <davidfstr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 7, 2013, 19:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5161C6EF.8010506@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <5161890E.701@op5.se>
> That aside; Does the package work if you reduce the security settings, > install it and then reset the security settings to their default > settings later? If so, I'd call that a reasonable workaround
It does. An even better workaround is to right-click (or Control-click) on the installer and select Open. This provides a slightly different dialog with gives an override to open the application anyway. This method avoids changing the OS security settings.
> and we probably won't even have to document it since google should provide it
If you intend to make the workaround official, then it would be a good idea to at least mention it on the download page. It is poor user experience to require users to use Google to workaround issues in a core installation scenario.
-- David Foster http://dafoster.net/
On 4/7/13 7:56 AM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
Show 26 quoted lines
> On 04/07/2013 03:55 AM, David Foster wrote: >> The default security settings on OS X 10.8 (Mountain Lion) disallow the >> installation of unsigned packages, with no override. >> >> Git/Mac 1.8.2 is not signed and therefore will not install without >> changing >> the OS default security settings. >> > > Sounds like an OSX lockin bugture to me. If anyone can sign the package > with any random key, then it wouldn't provide much in the way of > security, so I guess that means one has to get a signing key form Apple, > which I doubt they just hand out to anyone (usually it means paying > $100 to get an "apple developer certificate). That's nonsense, ofcourse, > but it's how they've chosen to do business. > > That aside; Does the package work if you reduce the security settings, > install it and then reset the security settings to their default > settings later? If so, I'd call that a reasonable workaround, and we > probably won't even have to document it since google should provide it > for git and a plethora of other useful packages. > > Otoh, if enough osx folks want git on the latest pussycat, I'm sure > they'll provide a package themselves sooner or later, in which case > you just have to wait for that to happen. >