Re: git-format-patch little gripe
- From
- Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2006, 09:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <511753.217.qm@web31807.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <46a038f90611030122reecee87ufac5bbaa910ee933@mail.gmail.com>
--- Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On 11/3/06, Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Yep, after more than a year, I simply cannot get used to it... > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git&m=113259043217761&w=2 > > And as I've seen, other people brought that up too. > > Hi Luben, > > reading the thread, it sounds like you have a couple of shells scripts > or aliases that do what you want already ;-)
Yeah, would you know it those scripts got lost somewhere. I now know better -- branch off of git "next" and store in USB key. :-) So I generally work off of "next" merged to my own branch which includes extras I've collected along the way.
But what wouldn't I give to have git-format-_patch_ -o /tmp/ <commit> generate a _single_ patch just as its name implies...
Luben