Re: GIT get corrupted on lustre

From: Sébastien Boisvert <sebastien.boisvert@calculquebec.ca>
Date: Jan 23, 2013, 14:45 UTC
Message-ID: <50FFF79F.6080103@calculquebec.ca>
In-Reply-To: <878v7keuh3.fsf@pctrast.inf.ethz.ch>

On 01/22/2013 05:14 PM, Thomas Rast wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines

> Eric Chamberland <Eric.Chamberland@giref.ulaval.ca> writes:
>
>> So, hum, do we have some sort of conclusion?
>>
>> Shall it be a fix for git to get around that lustre "behavior"?
>>
>> If something can be done in git it would be great: it is a *lot*
>> easier to change git than the lustre filesystem software for a cluster
>> in running in production mode... (words from cluster team) :-/
>
> I thought you already established that simply disabling the progress
> display is a sufficient workaround?  If that doesn't help, you can try
> patching out all use of SIGALRM within git.
>

In git (9591fcc6d66), I have found these SIGALRM signal handling:

builtin/log.c:268: sigaction(SIGALRM, &sa, NULL); builtin/log.c:285: signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN); compat/mingw.c:1590: mingw_raise(SIGALRM); compat/mingw.c:1666: if (sig != SIGALRM) compat/mingw.c:1668: error("sigaction only implemented for SIGALRM"); compat/mingw.c:1683: case SIGALRM: compat/mingw.c:1702: case SIGALRM: compat/mingw.c:1706: exit(128 + SIGALRM); compat/mingw.c:1708: timer_fn(SIGALRM); compat/mingw.h:42:#define SIGALRM 14 perl/Git/SVN.pm:2121: SIGALRM, SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2); progress.c:56: sigaction(SIGALRM, &sa, NULL); progress.c:68: signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN);

I suppose that compat/mingw.{h,c} and SVN.pm can be ignored as our patch to work around this problem won't be pushed upstream because the real problem is not in git, right ?

If I understand correctly, some VFS system calls get interrupted by SIGALRM, but when they resume (via SA_RESTART) they return EINTR. Thomas said that these failed calls may need to be retried, but that open(O_CREAT|O_EXCL) is still tricky around this case.

progress.c SIGALRM code paths are for progress and therefore are required, right ?

builtin/log.c SIGALRM code paths are for early output, and the comments in the code say that

    "If we can get the whole output in less than a tenth of a second, don't even bother doing the
     early-output thing."

So where do I start for the patch ?

> Other than that I agree with Junio, from what we've seen so far, Lustre
> returns EINTR on all sorts of calls that simply aren't allowed to do so.
>

-- 
---
Spécialiste en granularité (1 journée / semaine)
Calcul Québec / Calcul Canada
Pavillon Adrien-Pouliot, Université Laval, Québec (Québec), Canada