Re: [PATCH] l10n: de.po: translate 22 new messages
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Dec 3, 2012, 15:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <50BCC0A3.4050203@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1354510146-2919-1-git-send-email-ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Ralf Thielow venit, vidit, dixit 03.12.2012 05:49:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Translate 22 new messages came from git.pot > updates in 9306b5b (l10n: Update git.pot (3 new, > 6 removed messages)), fe52cd6 (l10n: Update git.pot > (14 new, 3 removed messages)) and f9472e3 > (l10n: Update git.pot (5 new, 1 removed messages)). > > Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> > --- > po/de.po | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/po/de.po b/po/de.po > index a0bf3da..7350818 100644 > --- a/po/de.po > +++ b/po/de.po
...
Show 6 quoted lines
> #: remote.c:1659 > -#, fuzzy > msgid " (use \"git pull\" to merge the remote branch into yours)\n" > msgstr "" > -" (benutze \"git am --abort\" um den ursprünglichen Zweig wiederherzustellen)" > +" (benutze \"git pull\" um den externen Zweig mit Deinem zusammenzuführen)\n"
That sounds as if git-pull did something to the remote branch, whereas it would do something with your local branch. Reverting the roles may help:
+" (benutze \"git pull\" um Deinen Zweig mit dem externen zusammenzuführen)\n"
BTW: Is there a standard about capitalising or not "Deine/Du" in de.pot? I think I've seen both here. (New spelling after the reform(s) recommends du/deine but Sie/Ihr, me thinks.)
Show 7 quoted lines
> #: builtin/grep.c:740 > msgid "pager" > @@ -8029,6 +8024,9 @@ msgid "" > "submodule '%s' (or one of its nested submodules) uses a .git directory\n" > "(use 'rm -rf' if you really want to remove it including all of its history)" > msgstr "" > +"Unterprojekt '%s' (oder ein geschachteltes Unterprojekt dessen) verwendet \n"
s/dessen/hiervon/ ?
> +"ein .git-Verzeichnis (benutze 'rm -rf' wenn du dieses wirklich mit seiner\n" > +"Historie löschen möchtest)"
s/mit/mitsamt/ ?
(to emphasize "including" like in the original and avoid "mit=by" misinterpretation)
Michael