Re: [PATCH 1/2] Teach --recursive to submodule sync
- From
Jens Lehmann <jens.lehmann@web.de>
- Date
- Oct 26, 2012, 18:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <508ADB6B.5040905@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <CABURp0q0uELTS4DQ=Kqfr+8Pr-KgLcGJaBY_kJE_AiO=BZu+Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Am 26.10.2012 19:55, schrieb Phil Hord:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, thanks for catching that. I think I should add a test for that >> except I notice that sync doesn't take any other flags useful for passing. > > Which, of course, suggests that I should not add this > flag-propagating-machinery to submodule-sync at all. yes?
Nope, the new --recursive option has to be passed on!
To catch that bug in your test you'd need another submodule inside your sub-submodule. The first level submodule is initialized by sync anyways, the sub-submodule is initialized by the --recursive logic you added but the sub-sub-submodule would not have been synced because the option was dropped. I really can't blame you for not adding that third level of submodules ;-)