Re: Who is the 'git' vendor?
- From
Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
- Date
- Oct 25, 2012, 08:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5088FDDC.20404@op5.se>
- In-Reply-To
- <8F7A9DADB4F4064EB938B0D3EBB63FDC208A5A34@PBNEMBMSX4120.int.Corp.sun>
On 10/25/2012 08:43 AM, PROHASKA, Thor wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Hi, > > The organisation I am currently working for uses 'git'. > > In order to manage all the software used in the organisation we have > been compiling a list of software that includes the software Vendor's > name. > > My colleague has listed the vendor of git as being the 'Software > Freedom Conservancy'. Can you please advise me if this is correct? If > not, who should the vendor be identified as? >
Most likely, you'll want to put "git@vger.kernel.org" as vendor for git, as the whole vendor concept doesn't really fly with FOSS. There's noone to go to if it breaks your systems, and unless you purchase a support contract from somewhere there's noone to turn to except the (excellent) git community in case you have issues with it.
-- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace.