Re: [PATCH 0/5] Cure some format-patch wrapping and encoding issues

> Jan H. Schönherr <schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> 
>> During the creation of this series, I came across the strbuf 
>> wrapping functions, and I wonder if there is an off-by-one issue.
>>
>> Consider the following excerpt from t4202:

> 
> Yeah, that does sound like an off-by-one bug.  When we as end users
> say %w(72), we do expect some lines fill to the 72nd column, not
> stopping at the 71st.  I suspect that dates back to the very first
> implementation of %w() but I think we should fix it (perhaps as a
> separate patch either the earliest or the last in the series).