Re: Google Code: Support for Mercurial and Analysis of Git and Mercurial
- From
- Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 26, 2009, 10:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4d8e3fd30904260321u46a4b177xe7c96c13836f3490@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0904261206170.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
On 4/26/09, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> Hi, > > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > >> On 4/26/09, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > The deciding feature (well, one of deciding features) was the fact >> > that Mercurial has better HTTP support... I guess (it was not obvious >> > from the analysis, but it was hinted at) that Mercurial uses its >> > custom protocol over HTTP, as opposed to "dumb" HTTP protocol support >> > in Git. >> > >> > Perhaps it is time to restart work on _"smart" HTTP protocol_? >> > >> >> >> wasn't Shawn working on it? > > GIVE HIM A BREAK!
it was just a question.
> Isn't Shawn doing enough for Git? No need to offload the stuff on him > _that you could very well tackle yourself_.
shawn is a stellar developer and with my message i didn't want to imply that he should do more than what is already doing. It was just a question to better understand the issue.
ciao.
-- Paolo http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/ http://mypage.vodafone.it/