Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sequencer: fix gpg option passed to merge subcommand
- From
- Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 16, 2020, 17:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4bbf0055-ed50-6560-7208-dce9378389c8@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqy2k6cejl.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On 16/10/2020 17:37, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes: > >> ... Reviewers that only read the patch without loading up the >> test file in their editor have no indication that the test should be >> clearing the config variable. > > It is not a review if the code being updated is not checked for > sanity in its own context, is it?
It is disappointing that you have chosen to cut the original to those few lines and reply just to them. The original message made the broader point that having to check the previous tests in a file to figure out what the state is at the beginning of any new test that gets added makes life harder than it needs to be both for contributors and reviewers.
Phillip