Re: What are branches?
- From
- Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 19, 2009, 22:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4ac8254d0904191510v72ab2f92t6839c8354d0c6fe4@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0904191709220.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Hi, > > if you're like me, you used Git for _way_ too long to really understand > how anybody can say that Git is hard to learn. The concepts underlying > Git have sunk so deep that I do not question them anymore. > > But it is important to keep in mind that our concept of branches is not > intuitive: > > http://longair.net/blog/2009/04/16/git-fetch-and-merge/ > > In particular, we have some pretty confusing nomenclature when it comes to > branches, and we might want to think how to improve the situation. > > Food for thought on a lazy Sunday afternoon.
Probably in the same confusion department: http://blog.teksol.info/2009/04/15/beware-of-gits-content-tracking.html
Is he right and is this the defined correct behavior?