git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: git pull with submodule

From
Jens Lehmann <jens.lehmann@web.de>
Date
Jun 24, 2012, 18:24 UTC
Message-ID
<4FE75B62.9020107@web.de>
In-Reply-To
<1564611.U3XyAbWYKV@toshi>
Am 23.06.2012 15:53, schrieb Sascha Cunz:
Show 15 quoted lines
> I noticed the following behaviour when pulling a repository that has a 
> submodule.
> 
> I have a standalone checkout of my subproject, which I regulary sync it with 
> its upstream and push the result to github. Then I go to my project where the 
> github repository is setup to be a subproject, 'cd' into the subproject and do 
> 'git pull' there. After that, I commit the subproject blob into the 
> superproject.
> 
> Now i switch OS and/or workstation and do a 'git pull' ( in root directory of 
> superproject ). Git then
> 	-> fetches new objects of superproject
> 	-> fetches new objects of subproject
> 	-> checks out the subproject to the SHA1 currently recorded in
>       the subproject blob. (Am i right on this one?)

No, you have to issue a "git submodule update" to check out the submodule according to the commit that is registered in the superproject. Only the SHA1 currently recorded in the superproject will be updated when the merge succeeds, the submodules work tree and HEAD stays untouched.

> 	-> merges superproject with it's upstream
> 
> After that, i have to cd into the subproject and 'git pull' there again, 
> because it just fetched the objects but did no merge nor checkout.

Hmm, the merge of the submodule commits in the superproject should have already been done by your pull there (as I understand your use case you only move the submodules commits forward, so there are no merge conflicts to be expected). Just doing a "git submodule update" in the superproject after the pull should do the trick.

> Is this intentional behaviour or am i doing something wrong / have wrong 
> expectations in that "after seeing it recurring into the subproject, i expect 
> i don't need to do further steps in order to have it up to date"?

This is the way things currently work. There is ongoing work to get rid of the need to run "git submodule update" when the commit recorded in the superproject changes due to a checkout, pull or whatever, but we're not there yet.

Previous: Sascha Cunz
Message 2 of 2 in “git pull with submodule”
  1. Sascha CunzJun 23, 2012
  2. Jens LehmannJun 24, 2012

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.