Show 34 quoted lines
>>>> >> > --- a/t/t4012-diff-binary.sh
>>>> >> > +++ b/t/t4012-diff-binary.sh
>>>> >> > @@ -36,6 +36,14 @@ test_expect_success '"apply --stat" output for binary file change' '
>>>> >> > test_i18ncmp expected current
>>>> >> > '
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > +cat > expected <<\EOF
>>>> >> > + 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>> >> > +EOF
>>>> >> > +test_expect_success 'diff with --shortstat' '
>>>> >> > + git diff --shortstat >current &&
>>>> >> > + test_cmp expected current
>>>> >> > +'
>>>> >> > +
>>> >> The test is OK, and follows the style of surrounding tests, but current
>>> >> style is slightly different:
>>> >> - no space after '>'
>>> >> - expected output is inlined if it is short
>>> >> - test_i18ncmp is used, even if the message is not yet i18n-ized
>>> >>
>>> >> Something like this:
>>> >> test_expect_success 'diff --shortstat output for binary file change' '
>>> >> echo " 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)" >expect &&
>>> >> git diff --shortstat >current &&
>>> >> test_i18ncmp expect current
>>> >> '
>> >
>> > Should I rewrite the test for this patch? Or should it be changed for the
>> > whole file at once?
> Please keep a bugfix patch to only fixes with tests. Style fixes
> should be done later after dust from more important changes (e.g. a
> bugfix) settles.
>
> Thanks.