Re: [PATCH] builtin/blame.c: Fix a "Using plain integer as NULL pointer" warning
- From
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
- Date
- May 15, 2012, 17:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4FB29358.90408@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <4FB0463D.4010909@lsrfire.ath.cx>
René Scharfe wrote:
Show 40 quoted lines
> Am 13.05.2012 23:41, schrieb Ramsay Jones:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones<ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi Junio,
>>
>> I try to catch these warnings, while the topics are still in the
>> pu branch, so that we can squash the fix into them before they
>> hit next. I don't know how I missed this one (commit 4b4132f,
>> "blame: factor out helper for calling xdi_diff()", 09-05-2012)
>> which was part of the 'rs/xdiff-lose-emit-func' branch.
>>
>> Sorry about that.
>>
>> ATB,
>> Ramsay Jones
>>
>>
>> builtin/blame.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/builtin/blame.c b/builtin/blame.c
>> index 778d661..24d3dd5 100644
>> --- a/builtin/blame.c
>> +++ b/builtin/blame.c
>> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int diff_hunks(mmfile_t *file_a, mmfile_t *file_b, long ctxlen,
>> {
>> xpparam_t xpp = {0};
>> xdemitconf_t xecfg = {0};
>> - xdemitcb_t ecb = {0};
>> + xdemitcb_t ecb = {NULL};
>>
>> xpp.flags = xdl_opts;
>> xecfg.ctxlen = ctxlen;
>
> The warning is given by sparse, not a C compiler, correct? It's
> probably worth shutting it up by making that change; my excuse for using
> {0} is that it is such a nice and portable idiom [1] for initializing
> any structure, however.Yes, sorry, it is indeed a sparse warning. (The original subject line mentioned sparse, but it was too long ... ;-)
Thanks!
ATB, Ramsay Jones