Re: [PATCH] Make 'cvs -n commit ...' not to commit
- From
- Eric Chamberland <eric.chamberland@giref.ulaval.ca>
- Date
- Mar 23, 2012, 19:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4F6CC8AC.4050907@giref.ulaval.ca>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vhaxftb54.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 03/23/2012 02:39 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> ericc<eric.chamberland@giref.ulaval.ca> writes: > >> Actually, doing a 'cvs -n commit' will _do_ the commit... >> With this patch, it now goes through the code, but don't do the commit. > > OK. > >> A further progress would be to do the pre-commit hook is possible...
Sorry, I wanted to write:
"A further progress would be to do the pre-commit hook *if* possible..."
here, we are used to do "cvs -n commit" just to check if the "hooks" on the cvs server will fail or not...
Show 31 quoted lines
>
> I understand that you tried to make the patch smaller by avoiding
> re-indenting, but this is *yucky*.
>
> It looks to me that the above part could be solved with:
>
> unless (...) {
> next;
> }
>
> I think the function being patched is too big. Wouldn't it be better to
> have a refactoring patch to move the above per-path logic to a helper
> function that deals with a single path, and then insert the "omit call to
> that helper when run with -n" code in a separate patch?
>
> The same comment applies to the other hunk.
>
> Also I notice that the indentation used throughout the file is somewhat
> broken (e.g. "Emulate by running hooks/update" part is indented to 8
> columns, but earlier parts use 4 space indent). The right structure for
> this change may be:
>
> Patch 1: Fix indentation (and do nothing else) to uniformly indent with
> HT;
>
> Patch 2: Refactor this big funciton using a handful of helper functions
> (and do nothing else);
>
> Patch 3: Omit calls to these helper functions under -n option.
>
>Ok you are right... These were my very first lines in Perl... I just wanted to catch the attention of someone who is able to do the changes correctly... and in a more clean way than I...
Eric