Re: who's on first? - following first parent and merge-management
- From
- Holger Hellmuth <hellmuth@ira.uka.de>
- Date
- Mar 9, 2012, 12:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4F59F212.6030701@ira.uka.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpqcndmpa.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 08.03.2012 18:30, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Johannes Sixt<j.sixt@viscovery.net> writes: >> To avoid the situation,... >> This would not be necessary if the order of the merge parents could be >> specified, e.g.: >> >> # on topic >> git merge --into master > > I think the underlying mechanism needed to implement the above > shares a lot with what Jeff called "crazy idea", but where you would > want to be after such a merge may be different in these two cases.
I don't think there is much question that you should still be in the same branch. Not because you necessarily want to be in that branch. But because it would be surprising if git-merge changed your branch sometimes and most times not.