Re: [PATCH] fmt-merge-msg: use branch.$name.description
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Oct 7, 2011, 09:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4E8ECA25.205@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20111007091636.GA22822@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net>
Jonathan Nieder venit, vidit, dixit 07.10.2011 11:16:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> config based is so non-distributed, local in nature. > > I don't follow. Wouldn't a protocol change be enough to fix that, by > sharing branch descriptions analagously to how refs themselves are > shared?
I'd be surprised if we changed the protocol just to be able to share some descriptions, when we have everything we need for sharing refs. Also note that config is non-versioned etc.
But my main point here is that we should discuss the pros and cons of each approach in context (the context of the original thread), and I haven't heard many pros and cons for either.
Michael