git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] gitignore: add top level patch ignore rule

From
Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
Date
Jul 21, 2011, 14:50 UTC
Message-ID
<4E283C9E.2050000@xiplink.com>
In-Reply-To
<CAGTPOqcd5G=NG83wgnH80nqNsS1FYwtRp4QjaB=oU5NkPts_Hg@mail.gmail.com>
On 11-07-21 09:22 AM, Vitaliy Ivanov wrote:
Show 42 quoted lines
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Michael J Gruber
> <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:
>> Vitaliy Ivanov venit, vidit, dixit 21.07.2011 14:54:
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Michael J Gruber
>>> <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:
>>>> Vitaliy Ivanov venit, vidit, dixit 20.07.2011 00:17:
>>>>> Add top level ignore rule for patches created by format-patch command.
>>>>
>>>> Please don't.
>>>>
>>>> The tracked ignore file is for ignoring products and artefacts of our
>>>> build process. format-patch is not part of this process, and the
>>>> existence of *.patch files depends on your workflow. But what is much
>>>> worse: In
>>>>
>>>> git status
>>>> git format-patch rev-spec
>>>> git send-email *.patch
>>>>
>>>> it is very easy to send out the wrong patches (along with the right
>>>> ones), because your patch hides them from status. Also, I can't clean
>>>> them up with "git clean -f" any more. I would have to use "git clean -f
>>>> -x" which would clean the build products also (and force a rebuild).
>>>>
>>>> So, your patch makes a format-patch based workflow much worse. What
>>>> problem does it try to solve?
>>>
>>> I will not insist. You may know it better but git as is a public
>>> project where anyone can create and send patches. So it seems to me
>>> basic workflow for sharing changes.
>>
>> Well sure it is. We do that and discuss the merits of patches.
>>
>> I do use format-patch/send-email, and as I explained, your patch would
>> make that more difficult. If there is something that it makes better
>> that may outweigh it. Can you explain what improvement this (ignoring
>> *.patch) introduces?
> 
> I'm not sure how listing all the patches that you have under "git
> status" will help you not to send a wrong one.
Seeing various patch files in "git status" bothered me as well.

So I put all my patches in a top-level patches/ directory, along with a patches/.gitignore file that ignores everything there.

If that doesn't meet your needs, you could instead add a core.excludesfile entry to your ~/.gitconfig, and in there ignore *.patch files.

So given those alternatives, I'm not convinced your patch is suitable for all git users.

		M.
Previous: Michael J GruberNext: Vitaliy Ivanov
Message 7 of 8 in “gitignore: add top level patch ignore rule”
  1. gitignore: add top level patch ignore ruleVitaliy Ivanov, Jul 19, 2011
  2. Michael J GruberJul 20, 2011
  3. Vitaliy IvanovJul 21, 2011
  4. Michael J GruberJul 21, 2011
  5. Vitaliy IvanovJul 21, 2011
  6. Michael J GruberJul 21, 2011
  7. Marc BranchaudJul 21, 2011
  8. Vitaliy IvanovJul 22, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.