Re: [PATCH] Interactive-rebase doesn't pick all children of "upstream"
- From
Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 5, 2011, 14:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4DEB8E7F.60705@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4DEB495F.9080900@kdbg.org>
On 11-06-05 5:16 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Am 05.06.2011 07:32, schrieb Andrew Wong: >> Currently, (1) and (2) will pick B, D, C, and E onto A and F, >> respectively. However, (3) will only pick D and E onto B. This >> behavior of (3) is inconsistent with (1) and (2), and we cannot modify C >> in the interactive-rebase. > I cannot reproduce your claims: > > - (1) and (2) picks B,C,D top A and F, but not E because E is a merge. > > - (3) picks C and D, but not E because E is a merge.
Ah, all those commands should have "-p" on them to preserve the merges. Thanks for the catch!