git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Why doesn't git commit -a track new files

From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Date
Feb 25, 2011, 08:51 UTC
Message-ID
<4D676D99.2010600@drmicha.warpmail.net>
In-Reply-To
<20110224160932.GC30275@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 24.02.2011 17:09:
Show 32 quoted lines
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:01:55PM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> 
>>>> - hom. interface: allow "-a pathspec" for commit
>>>
>>> What would it do? It would just behave like "git commit -i
>>> pathspec"?
>>
>> It should do what "-u pathspec" does for add: limit "all tracked" to the
>> pathspec. I know it's the same as without "-a", but why bail out on it?
> 
> Without "-a", we do "git commit -o", which is slightly different with
> respect to stuff in the index.  In the case of:
> 
>   git add -u <path> && git commit
> 
> we will add new changes from <path>, and then commit them along with
> whatever was already in the index.
> 
> With:
> 
>   git commit <path>
> 
> We will commit _just_ the changes in <path>, regardless of what is in
> the index.
> 
> I assumed that:
> 
>  git commit -a <path>
> 
> would behave more like the "git add -u <path>" case; add new stuff to
> the index from <path>, and then commit those changes plus whatever was
> already in the index.

Yes, you're right. I haven't wrapped my brain completely around those mixed cases yet (changes in index + pathspec argument). My aim is that

"git commit <addoptions> <commitoptions> [<pathspec>]"
would be equivalent to (the atomic version of)
"git add <addoptions> [<pathspec>] && git commit <commitoptions>"

and that is difficult because currently, pathspecs are "limiting" for commit and "additive" for add without -u. I mean, I don't want to break anything, at least not before 1.8.0..

>> I've done all the careful planning already, laid out in nice steps. Now
>> it's your time ;)
> 
> Heh. Transitioning to management, I see.
Still in negotiations ;)
> -Peff
Michael
Previous: Jeff KingNext: Jeff King
Message 11 of 25 in “Why doesn't git commit -a track new files”
  1. MarcoFeb 24, 2011
  2. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonFeb 24, 2011
  3. Pascal ObryFeb 24, 2011
  4. MarcoFeb 24, 2011
  5. Michael J GruberFeb 24, 2011
  6. Jeff KingFeb 24, 2011
  7. Michael J GruberFeb 24, 2011
  8. Jeff KingFeb 24, 2011
  9. Michael J GruberFeb 24, 2011
  10. Jeff KingFeb 24, 2011
  11. Michael J GruberFeb 25, 2011
  12. Jeff KingFeb 25, 2011
  13. Michael J GruberFeb 25, 2011
  14. Jeff KingFeb 25, 2011
  15. Matthieu MoyFeb 24, 2011
  16. Michael J GruberFeb 24, 2011
  17. MarcoFeb 24, 2011
  18. Miles BaderFeb 25, 2011
  19. Michael J GruberFeb 25, 2011
  20. Miles BaderFeb 26, 2011
  21. Marc WeberFeb 24, 2011
  22. Junio C HamanoFeb 24, 2011
  23. MarcoFeb 24, 2011
  24. Michael J GruberFeb 25, 2011
  25. Junio C HamanoFeb 25, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.