git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: git pull --rebase differs in behavior from git fetch + git rebase

From
Joshua Jensen <jjensen@workspacewhiz.com>
Date
Aug 27, 2010, 15:48 UTC
Message-ID
<4C77DE60.6020809@workspacewhiz.com>
In-Reply-To
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1008270124450.20874@narbuckle.genericorp.net>
  ----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Olszewski
Date: 8/27/2010 2:27 AM
Show 27 quoted lines
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Joshua Jensen wrote:
>
>> I have a case where 'git pull --rebase' does not do the Right Thing 
>> (according to me).
>>
>> If I run 'git rebase origin/master', that rebase does the right 
>> thing, perfectly reapplying my *single* commit on top of the upstream.
>>
>> 'git pull --rebase' ends up reapplying a bunch of much earlier 
>> commits and ends up with a conflict.
>>
>> The documentation for git pull --rebase states: "Instead of a merge, 
>> perform a rebase after fetching. If there is a remote ref for the 
>> upstream branch, and this branch was rebased since last fetched, the 
>> rebase uses that information to avoid rebasing non-local changes."  I 
>> do not understand
>>
>> I'm studying the git-pull script right now, but I have to admit this 
>> is beyond me.  I'm sure if I stare hard enough, I'll get it.
>>
>> I mistakenly have assumed 'git pull' = 'git fetch; git merge' and 
>> that 'git pull --rebase' = 'git fetch; git rebase'.  Does anyone want 
>> to clarify what is really going on?  Unfortunately, I can't publish 
>> the repository in question.
>
> Are you by any chance running a git with commit cf65426de?  If not, give
> it a try and see if it corrects your issue.
I was not, but now I am.
Show 6 quoted lines
> The main difference between "git pull --rebase" and "git fetch && git
> rebase @{u}" is that "git pull --rebase" will attempt to use the reflog
> to find a suitable "upstream" candidate instead of assuming your
> tracking branch is the upstream itself.  This is intended to help
> recover from upstream rebases, but has adverse effects sometimes, which
> commit cf65426de should help with.

Unfortunately, commit cf65426de helps only a little. The 'git pull --rebase' reports "Nothing to do" and moves the master branch to origin/master, leaving behind the commit needing to be rebased.

What else might there be to try? I would like to help with a repro, if possible.

Josh
Previous: Dave OlszewskiNext: Elijah Newren
Message 4 of 10 in “git pull --rebase differs in behavior from git fetch + git rebase”
  1. Joshua JensenAug 27, 2010
  2. Santi BéjarAug 27, 2010
  3. Dave OlszewskiAug 27, 2010
  4. Joshua JensenAug 27, 2010
  5. Elijah NewrenAug 27, 2010
  6. Joshua JensenAug 27, 2010
  7. Elijah NewrenAug 27, 2010
  8. Joshua JensenAug 28, 2010
  9. Elijah NewrenAug 28, 2010
  10. Joshua JensenAug 28, 2010

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.