Re: Systems with non-posix TAR implementations: How to handle

From: René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Date: Apr 26, 2010, 17:50 UTC
Message-ID: <4BD5D25F.904@lsrfire.ath.cx>
In-Reply-To: <s2sd2d39d861004260855l2ca5799fj7dfa70799ff1f307@mail.gmail.com>

Am 26.04.2010 17:55, schrieb Tor Arntsen:

Show 23 quoted lines

> Ref. the testlog that I posted in the thread "[PATCH] Add Tru64/OSF1
> support in Makefile"
> 
> *** t0024-crlf-archive.sh ***
> *   ok 1: setup
> * FAIL 2: tar archive
> 
> 
>                git archive --format=tar HEAD |
>                ( mkdir untarred && cd untarred && "$TAR" -xf - )
> 
>                test_cmp sample untarred/sample
> 
> 
>  *   ok 3: zip archive.
> 
> The problem with that test is that the Tru64 V5.1 'tar' says 'This
> doesn't look like a tar archive' on the generated file. However, it
> turns out that the tar file generated by 'git archive --format=tar' is
> fine, it's just that it's a POSIX tar archive and the Tru64 'tar'
> program isn't POSIX tar format compatible.
> How should we handle this? Just ignore errors in this test on Tru64,
> or is there some other way that I missed?

That depends: if you just want to make sure that the test works fine, you could install GNU tar, perhaps as gtar, and let TAR in Makefile (or config.mak) point to it. If the test fails with a tar that understands the format then you've found a bug.

It could get a bit more complicated if you want to use git archive to create tar files that the native tar can understand. For most repos it should be sufficient to specify a tree instead of a commit, e.g. with an added colon:

	git archive -o archive-without-comment.tar HEAD:

This makes git archive leave out the comment entry, which might upset some tar implementations. I don't know if that's sufficient to make Tru64 tar happy, though.

René