Re: Update on SoC proposal: git-remote-svn
- From
Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
- Date
- Apr 13, 2010, 08:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4BC42C98.6010006@vilain.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1271136573-sup-5613@kytes>
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> Hi Ramkumar, I've looked at this proposal and seen that it differs a >> bit from the version on the list, and I can't see the relevant >> discussion, so I'll just throw my bit in here - though note this is a >> technical comment and not a critique of your proposal. >> > > There's been a lot of discussion, some on the list, and some more off > the list. >
Right, that will be why :-). No problem, apologies for not catching the earlier discussion. It's good to hear that you have collectively reached a very similar design to the one indicated from my perforce importer experiment (SVN is of course, a poor imitation of Perforce in many ways).
Show 6 quoted lines
>> Anyway like I say, please follow-up on the mailing list, and this >> advice can receive wider scrutiny. >> > > Thank you for your valuable comment! >
No problem at all. I will watch the development of this project with interest.
All the best, Sam