Re: [PATCHv2] Teach --no-ff option to 'rebase -i'.
- From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
- Date
- Mar 17, 2010, 16:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4BA0FE59.7020303@viscovery.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100317155842.GA2557@m62s10.vlinux.de>
Peter Baumann schrieb:
Show 21 quoted lines
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 07:59:19AM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote: >> If I were to re-merge topic into master a second time after this >> situation, I would install a temporary graft that removes the second >> parent of M and repeat the merge. After the graft is removed, the history >> would look like this: >> >> B --- C --- D --------------. [topic] >> / \ \ >> A --- ... --- M ... --- U ... N [master] >> >> Are there any downsides? I don't know - I haven't thought it through. >> > > Might be. If there is any branch starting anywhere in between M and U > which also needs to merge [topic] will also cause you headaches :-) > > B --- C --- D --------------. [topic] > / \ \ > A --- ... --- M ... --- U ... N [master] > \ > x --- y [side_branch wich needs to merge topic]
?? I don't follow you. The side branch already contains the topic. What do you want to merge?
-- Hannes