Re: "git stash list" shows HEAD reflog
- From
René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
- Date
- Mar 13, 2010, 21:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4B9C086D.10004@lsrfire.ath.cx>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003131312540.796@narbuckle.genericorp.net>
Am 13.03.2010 22:21, schrieb Dave Olszewski:
> Maybe, although I'm not sure if dying here is the right behavior. Is an > empty reflog really an error?
Yeah, that might be a bit heavy-handed. *ahem*
> I was testing a patch along the lines of > what Vladimir proposed, which was simply to not set the default rev if a > valid user-specified argument was found, whether or not it contains > commits.
Sounds more like it. How did the tests go? Does it result in empty output (which is what I would expect from an empty reflog, now that I stopped and thought about it for a second)?
René