Re: [PATCH] git-pull.sh: Fix call to git-merge for new command format
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Dec 3, 2009, 08:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4B17728D.4070606@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7viqcpgtbf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 02.12.2009 18:49:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes: > >>> Yes. Anything that sets GIT_EXEC_PATH correctly can use git-foo form. >> >> I know they can. That was in the part you snipped ;) > > You asked about the presense of "a policy", and you got an answer.
I guess that was a language issue (on both sides) then, since "can" could be "is able to" as well as "is allowed to", and I read your answer in the former sense; the latter makes it a policy.
Show 8 quoted lines
>> The questions is: Should they? Should we avoid mixing both forms in one >> script? > > Should we avoid it? Yes but not very enthusiastically. We should make > sure that new invocations anybody adds use dashless form, but I would > recommend against a "let's remove use of dashed form" patch _unless_ you > find a time when the project is really quiet and there is nothing else > going on.
OK, that's all I wanted to know. Thanks.
Michael