Re: [PATCHv3] Add branch management for releases to gitworkflows
- From
- Raman Gupta <rocketraman@fastmail.fm>
- Date
- Nov 14, 2009, 17:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4AFEE882.4030208@fastmail.fm>
- In-Reply-To
- <20091114180123.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>
Nanako Shiraishi wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> Quoting Raman Gupta <rocketraman@fastmail.fm> > >> Ok, another dumb question: since you have now submitted a patch on top >> of my patch, what is the proper etiquette for proceeding? Who >> maintains this patch series until it is committed? Since your patch >> applies on top of mine I can't really make any more changes without >> affecting your patch right? I can't find any guidance in the >> SubmittingPatches document. > > What usually happens is that we wait now. > > In this case we are in agreement that it is a good idea to apply > both of our patches (mine was only repeating what Junio said in > his comments), so if I were you, I would anticipate that Junio > would apply both of them and start preparing incremental updates > on top of them now, and send them when the patches appear in his > 'pu' branch. > > Junio has gone quiet for the past few days; maybe he is too busy > to read or respond to either of our patch. Instead of preparing > the final text you write in the document in a patch format, it > may be a better to bring up your ideas here and discuss them > first. What changes do you have in mind? I think the new section > now already is in a reasonable shape.
No specific changes -- it was a hypothetical question...
Cheers, Raman